Just hours after picking up the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress , curvy diva Jennifer Hudson slammed the man who got her on the cover of Vogue Magazine. The testy diva ripped by fashion gossips for pairing a metallic python print bolero with a chocolate brown Oscar de la Renta gown says her only regret for the night was wearing the dress. According to Page Six, Vogue's Editor-at-Large, Andre Leon Talley was behind Jennifer Hudson's Oscar outfit. Fashion gossips claim Andre Leon Talley - who has been dressing Jennifer Hudson this awards season - was instrumental in securing the March 2007 Vogue Cover for Hudson. An insider told the gossip column, "Jennifer was kind of sponsored by Talley and Vogue." The source continued, "Andre insisted she wear that hideous Oscar de la Renta dress with the awful, awful gold python bolero. Jennifer really didn't want to, and so [celebrity stylist] Jessica Paster got her a beautiful gold Roberto Cavalli custom-made. But when Andre found out, he went ballistic. Moments before she left for the show, there was a power struggle and Jennifer ended up putting his outfit on." With the Vogue Cover, the Oscar and just about every major award, Hudson can afford to burn bridges , but what a way to say thanks. |
Jennifer Hudson Slams the man who got her the Vogue Cover?
Submitted by frillr on Wed, 2007-02-28 03:10.
|
|
tags for Jennifer Hudson Slams the man who got her the Vogue Cover?
jennifer hudson did NOT slam him..SHE WORE HIS OUTFIT TO BE NICE
your title is completely off...you're making it seem like Jennifer Hudson said terrible things about the man and that is not the case.
She knew like we all knew that her outfit was a disaster, but because he was her stylist, the editor of Vogue, and her several decades her senior, she went ahead and respectfully wore the outfit.
Really no one would EVER want to put that awful outfit on, I would have struggled to get my way as well. But the point is she did wear it to be nice. We cant forget that.
I'm just upset at your title, I know it gets readers but it misrepresents the truth,